Castleton WI Scrapbook, 2002, Volume 3, p. 7

The following text may have been generated by Optical Character Recognition, with varying degrees of accuracy. Reader beware!

im â€"* C e 20 200C 2 in n ns n ___ __ J 0 0 | COUHCll lOOkS at 1nn0v;t1ve sewer system o JukY 1140 2s . & j + © ,}Ibo."fl S [bmfil{l%\n{nfild enter the Col/bome sewage system . These tanks are pumped every seven to 10 By Bos OWEN and be processed at the Colborne treatment â€" years. Starr Wrirer plant. ¢ Mr. Connelly‘s Ottawaâ€"based company can Council looked at a proposal last week that Installation of this type of system takes design and build the system or contract the could cut the cost of sewage disposal in the â€" much less time than conventional mains techâ€" â€" work out. He recommends the designâ€"andâ€" industrial park by 50per cent. nology and produces minimal disruption to build method as more efficient. The entire Currently businesses in the park are using â€" the community during construction. system could be operational within a year of | septic systems and the township is looking at Capital costs are 20 to 30 per cent lower approval. It has a 50â€"year design life. connecting them to the municipal system. than traditional methods and engineering The Connelly proposal is one option facing The system which was described to council costs are dramatically less says Mr. Connelly. _ councilâ€"as it attempts to get a handle on where is called a small bore sewer. Significant savings are accrued because roads to go with its sewage issues, according to According to the president of Innovative do not have to be disturbed and the sewage Reeve Jim Williams. Water and sewage are Water & Sewer Systems, Richard Connelly, _ plant would not have to be upgraded as soon. two areas where council needs to upgrade or the system uses trenchless technology and The gravityâ€"based method is sanctioned by â€" add services. clarifier tanks to significantly reduce the cost the province and considered an innovative CAO Merlin Dewing has proposed that and impact of the installation. replicable technology, qualifying for lowâ€"cost businesses in the industrial park have an In the system he proposes long stretches of financing. 4 opportunity to look at the proposals for 3â€"inch pipe would be laid underground, much Cost to individual users in residential â€" sewage collection. For a project to qualify as a ~| like gas pipes are. They would be connected at installations is about $11,000 to $12,000 versus â€" local improvement a preâ€"determined percentâ€" each location in the park to clarifier tanks. $25,000 to $30,000 for methods currently used _ age of the landowners must accept a proposal. These waterproof dualâ€"compartment concrete says Mr. Connelly.. ; That acceptance would includeâ€"the method of + tanks would complete primary treatment of " _ Quantity of sewage reaching the treatment > payment or financing for the users. sewage, dramatically reducing solids and susâ€" . plant is reduced by at least 30 per cent, as Cost could be allocated on a perâ€"footageâ€"ofâ€" pended solids. The liquid which leaves the sludge and particles remain in the tanks. frontage basis. â€"â€"fiCâ€"_*â€"*_â€"*â€"_fi_â€"___â€"*â€"___dâ€"_‘ & ~~*‘ .i pakmy>. . > / & & Bs ~~ o - 3 «. it 5 _ . Sn es se | uts betye > tyol . esd aftmandfinnoan ds * 0 im k ah AuX) j un . M t L .. hn ‘, i M is WMs t /S it 1~> hm _ 1 .. We i <o> c . / n ce A Talns. â€" Aew‘ / P «. 5 y PuoRe > CV . 1 .\ Sae B es Ax l -‘\'.E "a al oeted. â€") =~ ~f x '5,-,\; 7.{, »-if“‘; & a;;g .fi g\g t3 f‘; # esd i Nt «90e fA P .3 f ""A . l e . > {!%,,ft"* l t / <eaed \SX ><l. . w 4 & ies 22 0 l . moule ts n ie . . oA â€" ~ /) ol w x C Aita | s j3 J a us %M‘&'g, w V 098 ,,g.p/; 3 Praern sns C . . . 0| P f K â€" YX ~ W . 0. x+ hss s â€" S . use e# 4C @9 > t . & 1 | ~JH F@ ° : whore Chronie/e Woy ue, . _ o $ ,»g es i!‘ f © ue t } j Hotos ay Bos Owen mog (an 5C000 ~Apa ED )7 . McKAGUES EN MASSE in Pz ol fi‘" ; ‘alle “‘7 "ve 1*?*‘ ' >“'J Above ieft: They came from far and near for the McKâ€" "" t i e . a 1 P 3 ‘;p ague 2002 Reunion last weekend. ~â€"â€"â€"â€"â€"â€"â€"â€"â€"â€" 9 ;1;,;.-44.;% K T PÂ¥ . ,, *4 gfn, 6 Jeff McKague (Port Hope), Marce] + b’ 45%. F C V@ _ <A. |. * / l is . F’. Hebert (Louisiana) and Paul Von ie s 7 U is * 12 }_f W Blaricom of Port Hope chat while ie 8. /R *** â€" n s f‘aflm i.=,,-r. h ? they wait for their turn at the buffet. o4 fl * Â¥ L . \. 9 h9 & i.« reigair A (a . w/) Above: Susan and Sylvia McKague, %{ «1 tk,4 % ‘g;fi“ * Ataces +3 t Aike . o descendants of William, sit on Colâ€" . wC 1.‘ L ke ,m *A o r@‘ o C % . ® borne‘s town hall steps and make ES\ Nce tm @ & ;""fi‘wg a § acquaintance with San Diego resiâ€" e RSioce y . 60 . o A lt o Ake dent Margaret Hill (right), a +219 _# ,_‘fi:"\‘;w" ts B f descendant of John. The McKague a * »biess" women were visiting from Winâ€" h i irsx" t > 3 nipeg. Left: There was lots to eat at ies Jt ty . 9 the McKague family reunion. Memâ€" * bers from as far away as Califorâ€" nla, British Columbia and the. southern states were on hand for the twoâ€" (3~ ) day getâ€"together,

Powered by / Alimenté par VITA Toolkit
Privacy Policy